Eisenhower matrix
Sort commitments by urgency against importance to decide what gets done, scheduled, delegated or dropped.
- Time cost
- 20 min
- Output
- Four lists with an action attached to each.
- Steps
- 5
Use when
- You are overloaded and cannot tell what to work on next.
- Work you consider important never starts, while urgent work always does.
- You need to hand work to other people and cannot decide which.
Do not use when
- You are choosing between options rather than sequencing work you have already committed to. This sorts a list; it does not make a choice.
- Everything is genuinely urgent, which is a capacity problem rather than a sorting problem.
Inputs required
- A complete list of commitments
- A definition of important that is not just “urgent”
Procedure
- 01
List everything
One list, nothing held mentally. Incomplete lists produce confident sorting of the wrong set.
- 02
Define important
Write what important means here before sorting: what does it move? If the definition is missing, important collapses into urgent and the matrix produces one quadrant.
- 03
Score both axes
Urgent means time-sensitive — a deadline exists and moves. Important means it changes an outcome you care about. They are independent.
- 04
Act per quadrant
Urgent and important: now. Important, not urgent: scheduled, with a date. Urgent, not important: delegate or reduce. Neither: delete, and say so out loud.
- 05
Check the second quadrant
If important-not-urgent is empty, everything is being driven by deadlines and nothing is being driven by intent. That is the finding.
Characteristic failure mode
Worked example
A person has nineteen open commitments and no sense of order.
- 01Important defined as: affects the next twelve months.
- 02Fourteen are urgent, but only five clear that definition.
- 03Six urgent-but-unimportant items go back to whoever asked.
Result
The quadrant that was empty was important-not-urgent. That emptiness, rather than the sorting, was what the exercise found.
Where to go next