Decisions
90 min

Nominal group technique

Have everyone write silently before anyone speaks, then round-robin and rank, so the first speaker does not set the range.

Time cost
90 min
Output
A ranked list with the spread of ranks shown.
Steps
5

Use when

  • A group must generate and prioritise options in one session.
  • One or two people usually dominate the discussion.
  • You want Delphi“s anti-anchoring effect without Delphi”s timescale.

Do not use when

  • The group is two or three people, where the structure is heavier than the problem.
  • The task needs genuine building on each other’s ideas — the silent phase prevents exactly that.

Inputs required

  • One clear question
  • A facilitator
  • 60 to 90 minutes in one room

Procedure

  1. 01

    State the question and go silent

    Everyone writes their own answers alone, for five to ten minutes. No discussion. This phase is the whole method.

  2. 02

    Round-robin without comment

    Each person contributes one item in turn, recorded verbatim. No evaluation, no discussion, no “that”s the same as'. Continue until everyone passes.

  3. 03

    Clarify only

    Now discuss, but only to understand what each item means. Merge duplicates only when the author agrees they are duplicates.

  4. 04

    Rank privately

    Each person ranks their top five on paper. Private ranking is what stops the discussion from being re-run as a vote.

  5. 05

    Aggregate and show the spread

    Sum the ranks. Show the totals and the disagreement. A high-variance item that two people ranked first is a different finding from one everyone ranked third.

Characteristic failure mode

Letting the round-robin turn into discussion. Once evaluation starts, later contributors edit their lists to match what has been received well, and the silent phase is wasted.

Worked example

A department must pick three priorities from an open field.

  1. 01Silent writing produces 47 items from 11 people.
  2. 02Round-robin surfaces 9 items that the usual discussion had never reached.
  3. 03Private ranking puts one of those 9 in the top three.

Result

One of the three chosen priorities came from someone who had not spoken in the previous two meetings on the same subject.

Where to go next

Also cited by
When a group is worse than one person